Home Web 3.0 Web 3 design is a mess. Web 2 may hold the answer

Web 3 design is a mess. Web 2 may hold the answer

by ethhack

Source Link

If you spend any time exploring Web 3—the blockchain-based alternative to the centralized internet we know today—you’ll likely conclude it’s difficult to use. Web 3 tools like the wallet Metamask or games like Axie Infinity feel clunky and counter-intuitive, and lack the sleek design of familiar internet services like Google or Netflix.

This is a problem. While millions of people are using Web 3, most are driven by the passion (or the greed) of early adopters and are willing to put up with clumsy designs to use exciting technologies like NFTs or token-based voting. But for Web 3 to be embraced by non-crypto natives—who are most of the population—the design must improve dramatically, and come to resemble internet products that people know already.

I brought up this topic with Kanav Kariya, the president of Jump Crypto, the influential Chicago investment and trading shop that is betting heavily on crypto and Web 3. To my surprise, Kariya agreed with my claim that Web 3 design is terrible. He noted that, in the case of NFTs, he still gets frustrated even though he has used them since the days of Crypto Kitties (a primitive version of NFTs that appeared in 2016).

What surprised me, even more, was Kariya’s prediction about how the Web 3 design problem will be solved. He told me crypto native companies like Coinbase or OpenSea are unlikely to be the ones that make Web 3 broadly accessible—something in the DNA of crypto people, Kariya says, makes them excel at technology rather than design.

Kariya predicted a design breakthrough will come instead from companies like Spotify, Amazon, or Netflix which are the giants of the Web 2 era. He pointed out, correctly, that these firms are masters of UX (geek-speak for user experience) and enticing people to try new products. Kariya says all of these firms are quietly working on Web 3 features already, and that it’s a matter of time until they begin rolling them out to their tens of millions of customers.

I was taken aback by his prediction—mostly because the original leaders of Web 3 conceived of the technology as a way to break the centralized, data-gobbling monopolies of Silicon Valley. But Kariya’s claim also makes a lot of sense. If someone is going to bring Web 3 tech into the mainstream, it’s more likely to be a giant firm with a mastery of design than a crypto startup that spends its days catering to HODLers and degens.

The idea of a Web 2 firm becoming an ambassador of Web 3 is fraught, of course. Isn’t the whole point of Web 3 to smash these centralized goliaths in the first place? Wouldn’t “Web 3 by Google” be a contradiction and a betrayal?

These are fair concerns but there’s no reason to think the ideals of Web 3 can’t thrive even as the Silicon Valley old guards adopts the technology. If the tech giants can introduce tens of millions of people to blockchain’s potential, it won’t be long till many of them begin to explore the broad and beautiful decentralized world outside those companies’ gates. And in any event, it will be a milestone event when someone solves the Web 3 design problem. Even if it is a Web 2 company.

Jeff John Roberts
jeff.roberts@fortune.com
@jeffjohnroberts

DECENTRALIZED NEWS

Credits 🚀 

Ripple launches crypto payments in Brazil

Crypto Is Taking a Few Small Banks on a Wild Ride

Ethereum Name Service domains double to 2 Million

Fractional raises $20 million to simplify joint NFT ownership, rebrands as Tessera

Debits 🐻 

Study says: 10-25% of Coinbase listings show signs of insider trading

Crypto broker Genesis slashes 20% of workforce and announces CEO exit

Pharma Bro’s crypto crashes after major wallet dumps tokens 

Matt Damon, Tom Brady Crypto Ads Vanish From TV 

THE MOONSHOT KIDS

Did you hear about the “crypto geniuses who vaporized a trillion dollars?” That’s the title of a New York magazine cover story everyone is buzzing about. It recounts the rise and fateful final days of Three Arrows Capital, the hedge fund whose implosion this spring set off a chain reaction that melted down large swaths of the crypto market.

The piece explains how two private school brats with ordinary skills rode the crypto wave to recast themselves as trading geniuses, and run a fund that turned out to be little more than a Ponzi scheme. Highlights include their attempt to buy a $500 million yacht named Much Wow, and reports they turned to the mafia as a lender of last resort. Meanwhile, their vaunted trading skills turned out to be an illusion:

The firm seemed rather indiscriminate about these bets, almost as if it viewed them as a charity. Earlier this year, Davies tweeted that “it doesn’t matter specifically what a VC invests in, more fiat in the system is good for the industry.” Says Chris Burniske, a founding partner of VC firm Placeholder, “They were clearly spray and pray.”

THE LEDGER’S LATEST

Zoo auctions orangutan art as NFTs by Marco Quiroz-Gutierrez

Bitcoin miner now making more money from selling power than Bitcoin by Shawn Tully

CEO Jeremy Allaire believes Circle’s big moment has come by Marco Quiroz-Gutierrez

Jump Crypto to build a new Solana validator client by Jeff John Roberts

Ethereum miners behind proposed fork say they’ve dismantled the ‘difficulty bomb’ by Taylor Locke

(Some of these stories require a subscription to access. Thank you for supporting our journalism.)

IF YOU DON’T KNOW, CRYPTO

If you’ve been in crypto for a while, you’re almost certainly a participant—or at least a spectator—of CT. That’s shorthand for “crypto Twitter.” The NY Mag piece describes its importance: “in an unregulated space without legacy institutions and with global markets trading 24/7, Crypto Twitter is the center of the arena, the clearinghouse for the news and views that move markets.”

This is the web version of The Ledger, Fortune’s weekly newsletter covering financial technology and cryptocurrency. Sign up here to receive future editions.

Related Articles

Leave a Comment